<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article SYSTEM "http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/inc/acpd/copernicus.dtd">
<article language="en">
	<journal>
		<journal_title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions</journal_title>
		<journal_url>www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net</journal_url>
		<issn>1680-7367</issn>
		<eissn>1680-7375</eissn>
		<volume_number>5</volume_number>
		<issue_number>6</issue_number>
		<publication_year>2005</publication_year>
	</journal>
	<doi>10.5194/acpd-5-13011-2005</doi>
	<article_url>http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/5/13011/2005/</article_url>
	<abstract_html>http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/5/13011/2005/acpd-5-13011-2005.html</abstract_html>
	<fulltext_pdf>http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/5/13011/2005/acpd-5-13011-2005.pdf</fulltext_pdf>
	<start_page>13011</start_page>
	<end_page>13052</end_page>
	<publication_date>2005-12-19</publication_date>
	<article_title content_type="html">Balloon-borne stratospheric BrO measurements: comparison with Envisat/SCIAMACHY BrO limb profiles</article_title>
	<authors>
		<author numeration="1" affiliations="1">
			<name>M. Dorf</name>
			<email>marcel.dorf@iup.uni-heidelberg.de</email>
		</author>
		<author numeration="2" affiliations="1,10">
			<name>H. Bösch</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="3" affiliations="1">
			<name>A. Butz</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="4" affiliations="3">
			<name>C. Camy-Peyret</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="5" affiliations="5">
			<name>M. P. Chipperfield</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="6" affiliations="9">
			<name>A. Engel</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="7" affiliations="7">
			<name>F. Goutail</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="8" affiliations="6">
			<name>K. Grunow</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="9" affiliations="8">
			<name>F. Hendrick</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="10" affiliations="2">
			<name>S. Hrechanyy</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="11" affiliations="6">
			<name>B. Naujokat</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="12" affiliations="7">
			<name>J.-P. Pommereau</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="13" affiliations="8">
			<name>M. Van Roozendael</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="14" affiliations="4">
			<name>C. Sioris</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="15" affiliations="2">
			<name>F. Stroh</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="16" affiliations="1">
			<name>F. Weidner</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="17" affiliations="1">
			<name>K. Pfeilsticker</name>
		</author>
	</authors>
	<affiliations>
		<affiliation numeration="1" content_type="html">Institut für Umweltphysik, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="2" content_type="html">Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Institut für Chemie und Dynamik der Geosphäre ICG-I: Stratosphäre, Jülich, Germany</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="3" content_type="html">Laboratoire de Physique Moléculaire pour l’Atmosphère et l’Astrophysique (LPMAA), Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="4" content_type="html">Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge, USA</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="5" content_type="html">Institute for Atmospheric Science, School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="6" content_type="html">Meteorologisches Institut, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="7" content_type="html">Service d’Aeronomie du CNRS, Verrières le Buisson, France</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="8" content_type="html">Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy (BIRA-IASB), Brussels, Belgium</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="9" content_type="html">Institute for Atmosphere and Environment, J. W. Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="10" content_type="html">now at: Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), Pasadena, USA</affiliation>
	</affiliations>
	<abstract content_type="html">For the first time, results of all four existing stratospheric BrO
profiling instruments, are presented and compared with reference to the
SLIMCAT 3-dimensional chemical transport model (3-D CTM). Model calculations
are used to infer a BrO profile validation set, measured by 3
different balloon sensors, for the new Envisat/SCIAMACHY (ENVIronment
SATellite/SCanning Imaging Absorption spectroMeter for Atmospheric
CHartographY) satellite instrument. The balloon observations include (a)
balloon-borne in situ resonance fluorescence detection of
BrO, (b) balloon-borne solar occultation DOAS measurements
(Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy) of BrO in the UV, and
(c) BrO profiling from the solar occultation SAOZ (Systeme d&apos;Analyse
par Observation Zenithale) balloon instrument. Since stratospheric BrO
is subject to considerable diurnal variation and none of the measurements are
performed close enough in time and space for a direct comparison, all balloon
observations are considered with reference to outputs from the 3-D CTM. The
referencing is performed by forward and backward air mass trajectory
calculations to match the balloon with the satellite observations. The
diurnal variation of BrO is considered by 1-D photochemical model
calculation along the trajectories. The 1-D photochemical model is
initialised with output data of the 3-D model with additional constraints on
the vertical transport, the total amount and photochemistry of stratospheric
bromine as given by the various balloon observations. Total
[Br&lt;sub&gt;y&lt;/sub&gt;]=(20.1&amp;plusmn;2.8)pptv obtained from DOAS BrO observations at
mid-latitudes in 2003, serves as an upper limit of the comparison. Most of
the balloon observations agree with the photochemical model predictions
within their given error estimates. First retrieval exercises of BrO
limb profiling from the SCIAMACHY satellite instrument agree to &amp;lt;&amp;plusmn;50%
with the photochemically-corrected balloon observations, and tend to show
less agreement below 20 km.</abstract>
	<references>
	</references>
</article>

