<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article SYSTEM "http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/inc/acpd/copernicus.dtd">
<article language="en">
	<journal>
		<journal_title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions</journal_title>
		<journal_url>www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net</journal_url>
		<issn>1680-7367</issn>
		<eissn>1680-7375</eissn>
		<volume_number>5</volume_number>
		<issue_number>5</issue_number>
		<publication_year>2005</publication_year>
	</journal>
	<doi>10.5194/acpd-5-10747-2005</doi>
	<article_url>http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/5/10747/2005/</article_url>
	<abstract_html>http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/5/10747/2005/acpd-5-10747-2005.html</abstract_html>
	<fulltext_pdf>http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/5/10747/2005/acpd-5-10747-2005.pdf</fulltext_pdf>
	<start_page>10747</start_page>
	<end_page>10797</end_page>
	<publication_date>2005-10-27</publication_date>
	<article_title content_type="html">Inter-comparison of stratospheric O&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt; and NO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; abundances retrieved from balloon borne direct sun observations and Envisat/SCIAMACHY limb measurements</article_title>
	<authors>
		<author numeration="1" affiliations="1,2">
			<name>A. Butz</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="2" affiliations="1,8">
			<name>H. Bösch</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="3" affiliations="2">
			<name>C. Camy-Peyret</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="4" affiliations="5">
			<name>M. Chipperfield</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="5" affiliations="1">
			<name>M. Dorf</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="6" affiliations="2,9">
			<name>G. Dufour</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="7" affiliations="6">
			<name>K. Grunow</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="8" affiliations="2">
			<name>P. Jeseck</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="9" affiliations="1">
			<name>S. Kühl</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="10" affiliations="2">
			<name>S. Payan</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="11" affiliations="2">
			<name>I. Pepin</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="12" affiliations="1,7">
			<name>J. Pukite</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="13" affiliations="3">
			<name>A. Rozanov</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="14" affiliations="3">
			<name>C. von Savigny</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="15" affiliations="4">
			<name>C. Sioris</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="16" affiliations="1">
			<name>T. Wagner</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="17" affiliations="1">
			<name>F. Weidner</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="18" affiliations="1">
			<name>K. Pfeilsticker</name>
		</author>
	</authors>
	<affiliations>
		<affiliation numeration="1" content_type="html">Institut für Umweltphysik, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="2" content_type="html">Laboratoire de Physique Moléculaire pour l’Atmosphère et l’Astrophysique (LPMAA), Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="3" content_type="html">Institute of Environmental Physics and Institute of Remote Sensing, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="4" content_type="html">Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge, USA</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="5" content_type="html">Institute for Atmospheric Science, School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="6" content_type="html">Meteorologisches Institut, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="7" content_type="html">Institute of Atomic Physics and Spectroscopy, University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="8" content_type="html">now at: Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, USA</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="9" content_type="html">now at: Department of Chemistry, University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada</affiliation>
	</affiliations>
	<abstract content_type="html">Stratospheric O&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt; and NO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; abundances measured by different
remote sensing instruments are inter-compared: (1)&amp;nbsp;Line-of-sight
absorptions and vertical profiles inferred from solar spectra in
the ultra-violet (UV), visible and infrared (IR) wavelength ranges
measured by the LPMA/DOAS (Limb Profile Monitor of the
Atmosphere/Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy) balloon
payload during balloon ascent/descent and solar occultation are
examined with respect to internal consistency. (2)&amp;nbsp;The balloon
borne stratospheric profiles of O&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt; and NO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; are compared to
collocated space-borne skylight limb observations of the
Envisat/SCIAMACHY satellite instrument. The trace gas profiles
are retrieved from SCIAMACHY spectra using different algorithms
developed at the Universities of Bremen and Heidelberg and at the
Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics. A comparison scheme
is used that accounts for the spatial and temporal mismatch as
well as differing photochemical conditions between the balloon and
satellite borne measurements. It is found that the balloon borne
measurements internally agree to within &amp;plusmn;10% and
&amp;plusmn;20% for O&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt; and NO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;, respectively, whereas the
agreement with the satellite is &amp;plusmn;20% for both gases in the
20 km to 30 km altitude range and in general worse below 20 km.</abstract>
	<references>
	</references>
</article>

