<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article SYSTEM "http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/inc/acpd/copernicus.dtd">
<article language="en">
	<journal>
		<journal_title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions</journal_title>
		<journal_url>www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net</journal_url>
		<issn>1680-7367</issn>
		<eissn>1680-7375</eissn>
		<volume_number>4</volume_number>
		<issue_number>6</issue_number>
		<publication_year>2004</publication_year>
	</journal>
	<doi>10.5194/acpd-4-7291-2004</doi>
	<article_url>http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/4/7291/2004/</article_url>
	<abstract_html>http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/4/7291/2004/acpd-4-7291-2004.html</abstract_html>
	<fulltext_pdf>http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/4/7291/2004/acpd-4-7291-2004.pdf</fulltext_pdf>
	<start_page>7291</start_page>
	<end_page>7353</end_page>
	<publication_date>2004-11-05</publication_date>
	<article_title content_type="html">Aerosol optical depth measurements by airborne sun photometer in SOLVE II: Comparisons to SAGE III, POAM III and airborne spectrometer measurements</article_title>
	<authors>
		<author numeration="1" affiliations="1">
			<name>P. Russell</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="2" affiliations="2">
			<name>J. Livingston</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="3" affiliations="3">
			<name>B. Schmid</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="4" affiliations="1">
			<name>J. Eilers</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="5" affiliations="1">
			<name>R. Kolyer</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="6" affiliations="3">
			<name>J. Redemann</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="7" affiliations="3">
			<name>S. Ramirez</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="8" affiliations="4">
			<name>J.-H. Yee</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="9" affiliations="4">
			<name>W. Swartz</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="10" affiliations="5">
			<name>R. Shetter</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="11" affiliations="6">
			<name>C. Trepte</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="12" affiliations="7">
			<name>A. Risley Jr. Jr.</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="13" affiliations="7">
			<name>B. Wenny</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="14" affiliations="6">
			<name>J. Zawodny</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="15" affiliations="6">
			<name>W. Chu</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="16" affiliations="6">
			<name>M. Pitts</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="17" affiliations="8">
			<name>J. Lumpe</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="18" affiliations="8">
			<name>M. Fromm</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="19" affiliations="9">
			<name>C. Randall</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="20" affiliations="10">
			<name>K. Hoppel</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="21" affiliations="10">
			<name>R. Bevilacqua</name>
		</author>
	</authors>
	<affiliations>
		<affiliation numeration="1" content_type="html">NASA Ames Research Center, MS 245-5, Moffett Field, USA</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="2" content_type="html">SRI International, Menlo Park, USA</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="3" content_type="html">Bay Area Environmental Research Institute, Sonoma, USA</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="4" content_type="html">Applied Physics Laboratory, Johns Hopkins University, Laurel, USA</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="5" content_type="html">National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, USA</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="6" content_type="html">NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, USA</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="7" content_type="html">SAIC, NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, USA</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="8" content_type="html">Computational Physics, Inc., Springfield, USA</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="9" content_type="html">Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics, University of Colorado, Boulder, USA</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="10" content_type="html">Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC 20375-5351, USA</affiliation>
	</affiliations>
	<abstract content_type="html">The 14-channel NASA Ames Airborne Tracking Sunphotometer (AATS-14) measured
solar-beam transmission on the NASA DC-8 during the Second SAGE III Ozone
Loss and Validation Experiment (SOLVE II). This paper presents AATS-14
results for multiwavelength aerosol optical depth (&lt;I&gt;AOD&lt;/I&gt;), including its
spatial structure and comparisons to results from two satellite sensors and
another DC-8 instrument. These are the Stratospheric Aerosol and Gas
Experiment III (SAGE III), the Polar Ozone and Aerosol Measurement III (POAM
III) and the Direct-beam Irradiance Airborne Spectrometer (DIAS). AATS-14
provides aerosol results at 13 wavelengths &amp;lambda; spanning the
full range of SAGE III and POAM III aerosol wavelengths. Because most AATS
measurements were made at solar zenith angles (&lt;I&gt;SZA&lt;/I&gt;) near 90&amp;deg;, retrieved
&lt;I&gt;AOD&lt;/I&gt;s are strongly affected by uncertainties in the relative optical airmass
of the aerosols and other constituents along the refracted line of sight
(LOS) between instrument and sun. To reduce dependence of the AATS-satellite
comparisons on airmass, we perform the comparisons in line-of-sight (LOS)
transmission and LOS optical thickness (OT) as well as in vertical OT (i.e.,
optical depth, &lt;I&gt;OD&lt;/I&gt;). We also use a new airmass algorithm that validates the
algorithm we previously used to within 2% for &lt;I&gt;SZA&lt;/I&gt;&amp;lt;90&amp;deg;, and in
addition provides results for &lt;I&gt;SZA&lt;/I&gt;&amp;ge;90&amp;deg;.

&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
For 6 DC-8 flights, 19 January&amp;ndash;2 February 2003, AATS and DIAS results for
LOS aerosol optical thickness (AOT) at &amp;lambda;=400 nm agree to &amp;le;12%
of the AATS value. Mean and root-mean-square (RMS) differences,
(DIAS-AATS)/AATS, are &amp;ndash;2.3% and 7.7%, respectively.

&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
For DC-8 altitudes, AATS-satellite comparisons are possible only for
&amp;lambda;&amp;gt;440 nm, because of signal depletion for shorter &amp;lambda;
on the satellite full-limb LOS. For the 4 AATS-SAGE and 4 AATS-POAM
near-coincidences conducted 19&amp;ndash;31 January 2003, AATS-satellite &lt;I&gt;AOD&lt;/I&gt;
differences were &amp;le;0.0041 for all &amp;lambda;&amp;gt;440 nm. RMS differences
were &amp;le;0.0022 for SAGE-AATS and &amp;le;0.0026 for POAM-AATS. RMS
percentage differences in &lt;I&gt;AOD&lt;/I&gt; ([SAGE-AATS]/AATS) were &amp;le;33% for
&amp;lambda;&amp;lt;~755 nm, but grew to 59% for 1020 nm and 66% at
1545 nm. For &amp;lambda;&amp;gt;~755 nm, AATS-POAM differences were less
than AATS-SAGE differences, and RMS percentage differences in &lt;I&gt;AOD&lt;/I&gt;
([AATS-POAM]/AATS) were &amp;le;31% for all &amp;lambda; between 440 and
1020 nm. Unexplained differences that remain are associated with
transmission differences, rather than differences in gas subtraction or
conversion from LOS to vertical quantities. The very small stratospheric
&lt;I&gt;AOD&lt;/I&gt;
values that occurred during SOLVE II added to the challenge of the
comparisons, but do not explain all the differences.</abstract>
	<references>
	</references>
</article>

