<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACPD</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACPD</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1680-7375</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus GmbH</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acpd-4-5515-2004</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title>Using photochemical models for the validation of NO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; satellite measurements at different solar zenith angles</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Bracher</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Sinnhuber</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Rozanov</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Burrows</surname>
<given-names>J. P.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
</contrib-group><aff id="aff1">
<label>1</label>
<addr-line>Institute of Environmental Physics and Remote Sensing (IUP/IFE), University of Bremen, 28334 Bremen, Germany</addr-line>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>21</day>
<month>09</month>
<year>2004</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>4</volume>
<issue>5</issue>
<fpage>5515</fpage>
<lpage>5548</lpage>
<permissions>
<license xlink:type="simple">
<license-p>This is an open-access article ditributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.</license-p>
</license>
</permissions>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/4/5515/2004/acpd-4-5515-2004.html">This article is available from http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/4/5515/2004/acpd-4-5515-2004.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/4/5515/2004/acpd-4-5515-2004.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/4/5515/2004/acpd-4-5515-2004.pdf</self-uri>
<abstract>
<p>SCIAMACHY (Scanning Imaging Spectrometer for Atmospheric Chartography)
aboard the recently launched Environmental Satellite (ENVISAT) of ESA is
measuring solar radiance upwelling from the atmosphere and the
extraterrestrial irradiance. Appropriate inversion of the ultraviolet and
visible radiance measurements, observed from the atmospheric limb, yields
profiles of nitrogen dioxide, NO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;,
 in the stratosphere. In order to assess
their accuracy, the resulting NO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; 
profiles have been compared with
those retrieved from the space borne occultation instruments Halogen
Occultation Experiment (HALOE, data version v19) and Stratospheric Aerosol
and Gas Experiment&amp;nbsp;II (SAGE&amp;nbsp;II, data version 6.20). As the HALOE and SAGE&amp;nbsp;II
measurements are performed during local sunrise or sunset and because
NO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; has a significant diurnal variability, the NO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; profiles derived
from HALOE and SAGE&amp;nbsp;II have been transformed to those predicted for the
solar zenith angles of the SCIAMACHY measurement by using a 1-D
photochemical model. The model used to facilitate the comparison of the
NO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; profiles from the different satellite sensors is described and an error assessment provided. Comparisons between NO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; profiles from
SCIAMACHY and those from HALOE NO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; but transformed to the SCIAMACHY
solar zenith angle, for collocations from July to October 2002, show good
agreement (within +/&amp;minus;15%) between the altitude range from 22 to 33 km.
The results from the comparison of all collocated NO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; profiles from
SCIAMACHY and those from SAGE&amp;nbsp;II transformed to the SCIAMACHY solar zenith
angle show a systematic negative bias of 10 to 35% between 20 km to
38 km with a small standard deviation between 5 to 14%. These results agree
with those of Newchurch and Ayoub (2004), implying that above 20 km NO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; profiles from SAGE&amp;nbsp;II sunset are probably somewhat high.</p>
</abstract>
<counts><page-count count="34"/></counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body/>
<back>
</back>
</article>