<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article SYSTEM "http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/inc/acpd/copernicus.dtd">
<article language="en">
	<journal>
		<journal_title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions</journal_title>
		<journal_url>www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net</journal_url>
		<issn>1680-7367</issn>
		<eissn>1680-7375</eissn>
		<volume_number>4</volume_number>
		<issue_number>1</issue_number>
		<publication_year>2004</publication_year>
	</journal>
	<doi>10.5194/acpd-4-507-2004</doi>
	<article_url>http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/4/507/2004/</article_url>
	<abstract_html>http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/4/507/2004/acpd-4-507-2004.html</abstract_html>
	<fulltext_pdf>http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/4/507/2004/acpd-4-507-2004.pdf</fulltext_pdf>
	<start_page>507</start_page>
	<end_page>532</end_page>
	<publication_date>2004-01-22</publication_date>
	<article_title content_type="html">Impact of different emission inventories on simulated tropospheric ozone over China: a regional chemical transport model evaluation</article_title>
	<authors>
		<author numeration="1" affiliations="1">
			<name>J. Ma</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="2" affiliations="2">
			<name>J. A. van Aardenne</name>
		</author>
	</authors>
	<affiliations>
		<affiliation numeration="1" content_type="html">Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences, People’s Republic of China</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="2" content_type="html">Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, Mainz, Germany</affiliation>
	</affiliations>
	<abstract content_type="html">The importance of emission inventory uncertainty on the simulation of
      summertime tropospheric Ozone over China has been analyzed using a regional
      chemical transport model. Three independent emissions inventories, that are
      (i) emission estimates from the Emission Database for Global Atmospheric Research (EDGAR) for the year 1995, (ii) a regional emission inventory used
      in the Transport and Chemical Evolution over the Pacific (TRACE-P) program
      with emissions for the year 2000 and (iii) a national emission inventory used in the China Ozone Research Program (CORP) with emission estimates for
      the year 1995, are used for model simulation over a summer period. Methods
      used for the development of the inventories are discussed and differences in
      simulated ozone and its precursors with these emission inventories are analyzed. Comparison of the emission inventories revealed large differences
      in the emission estimates (up to 50% for NO&lt;sub&gt;x&lt;/sub&gt;, ~100% for NMVOC and
      ~1000% for CO). Application of the different emission inventories in three model simulations showed minor differences in both
      surface O&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt; in rather unpolluted areas in China and at higher altitudes
      (500 mbar). In polluted areas, differences in surface O&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt; are
      30-50% between the different model simulations which seems rather small taking into
      account the large differences in the emission inventories. Additional sensitivity runs showed that the difference in
      NO&lt;sub&gt;x&lt;/sub&gt; emissions as well NMVOC emissions is a dominant factor which controls the differences in
      simulated O&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt; concentrations while the impact of differences in CO
      emissions is relatively small. Although the CO emission estimate by CORP seems to be underestimated, there is no confidence to highlight one emission
      inventory better than the others.</abstract>
	<references>
	</references>
</article>

