<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article SYSTEM "http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/inc/acpd/copernicus.dtd">
<article language="en">
	<journal>
		<journal_title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions</journal_title>
		<journal_url>www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net</journal_url>
		<issn>1680-7367</issn>
		<eissn>1680-7375</eissn>
		<volume_number>4</volume_number>
		<issue_number>4</issue_number>
		<publication_year>2004</publication_year>
	</journal>
	<doi>10.5194/acpd-4-4227-2004</doi>
	<article_url>http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/4/4227/2004/</article_url>
	<abstract_html>http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/4/4227/2004/acpd-4-4227-2004.html</abstract_html>
	<fulltext_pdf>http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/4/4227/2004/acpd-4-4227-2004.pdf</fulltext_pdf>
	<start_page>4227</start_page>
	<end_page>4284</end_page>
	<publication_date>2004-08-04</publication_date>
	<article_title content_type="html">NOGAPS-ALPHA model simulations of stratospheric ozone during the SOLVE2 campaign</article_title>
	<authors>
		<author numeration="1" affiliations="1">
			<name>J. P. McCormack</name>
			<email>mccormack@nrl.navy.mil</email>
		</author>
		<author numeration="2" affiliations="1">
			<name>S. D. Eckermann</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="3" affiliations="1">
			<name>L. Coy</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="4" affiliations="2">
			<name>D. R. Allen</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="5" affiliations="3">
			<name>Y.-J. Kim</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="6" affiliations="3">
			<name>T. Hogan</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="7" affiliations="4">
			<name>B. Lawrence</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="8" affiliations="4">
			<name>A. Stephens</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="9" affiliations="5">
			<name>E. V. Browell</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="10" affiliations="6">
			<name>J. Burris</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="11" affiliations="6">
			<name>T. McGee</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="12" affiliations="5">
			<name>C. R. Trepte</name>
		</author>
	</authors>
	<affiliations>
		<affiliation numeration="1" content_type="html">E.O. Hulburt Center for Space Research, Naval Research Laboratory, Washington DC, USA</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="2" content_type="html">Remote Sensing Division, Naval Research Laboratory, Washington DC, USA</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="3" content_type="html">Marine Meteorology Division, Naval Research Laboratory, Monterey, California, USA</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="4" content_type="html">British Atmospheric Data Center, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Oxfordshire, UK</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="5" content_type="html">NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, Virginia, USA</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="6" content_type="html">NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, USA</affiliation>
	</affiliations>
	<abstract content_type="html">This paper presents three-dimensional prognostic ozone simulations
with parameterized photochemistry from the new NOGAPS-ALPHA middle atmosphere
forecast model. We compare 5-day NOGAPS-ALPHA hindcasts of
stratospheric ozone with a combination of satellite and
DC-8 aircraft measurements for two specific cases during
the SOLVE II campaign: (1) the cold, isolated vortex during 11&amp;ndash;16 January 2003;
and (2) the rapidly developing stratospheric warming of 17&amp;ndash;22 January 2003.
In the first case we test three different photochemistry parameterizations.
NOGAPS-ALPHA ozone simulations using the NRL-CHEM2D parameterization give the
best overall agreement with SAGE III and POAM III profile measurements.
5-day NOGAPS-ALPHA hindcasts of polar ozone
initialized with the NASA GEOS4 ozone analyses produce better agreement
with observations than do the operational ECMWF ozone forecasts.
In the second case, comparisons between NOGAPS-ALPHA and ECMWF
114-h forecasts of the split vortex structure in stratospheric ozone
on 21 January 2003 show comparable skill. Updated
ECMWF ozone forecasts of this case at hour 42 display marked
improvement from the 114-h forecast; corresponding updated 42-h
NOGAPS-ALPHA prognostic ozone simulations do not improve significantly.
In general, these results demonstrate that the spectral advection
component in NOGAPS-ALPHA is well-suited for middle atmosphere tracer
transport. In particular, we find that stratospheric ozone forecasts
at high latitudes in winter can depend on both model initial
conditions and the treatment of photochemistry even over a period of 5 days.</abstract>
	<references>
	</references>
</article>

