|
|
Extrapolating future Arctic ozone lossesB. M. Knudsen, S. B. Andersen, B. Christiansen, N. Larsen, M. Rex, N. R. P. Harris, and B. NaujokatAbstract  Notice on Discussion StatusThe requested discussion paper has a corresponding peer-reviewed
final revised paper in the journal Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP). You are
encouraged to refer to the final revised version. Final Revised Paper (ACP) Discussion Paper (PDF, 372 KB) | Interactive Discussion | Status: Closed |
| AC: Author Comment | RC: Referee Comment | SC: Short Comment | EC: Editor Comment |
 - Printer-friendly Version  - Supplement |
| | | RC S1056: 'Review', Anonymous Referee #1, 30 Jun 2004 | | | | SC S1068: 'Is there really an alternative........?', John Austin, 01 Jul 2004 | | SC S1189: 'Reply to John Austin', Björn M. Knudsen, 13 Jul 2004 | | SC S1287: 'Is there really an alternative....', John Austin, 21 Jul 2004 | | AC S1515: 'Reply to John Austin', Björn M. Knudsen, 10 Aug 2004 | | SC S1517: 'Is there an alternative? NO', John Austin, 10 Aug 2004 | | | | SC S1073: 'Is there an alternative.....? Part 2', John Austin, 01 Jul 2004 | | SC S1192: 'Reply to John Austin', Björn M. Knudsen, 13 Jul 2004 | | | | SC S1214: 'Are future O3 extrapolations meaningful?', Giovanni Pitari, 15 Jul 2004 | | AC S1436: 'Reply to Giovanni Pitari', Björn M. Knudsen, 02 Aug 2004 | | SC S1520: 'Comment from Gianni', John Austin, 10 Aug 2004 | | | | AC S1691: 'Final author comments', Björn M. Knudsen, 03 Sep 2004 | | | | EC S1744: 'Editors decision', Martin Dameris, 09 Sep 2004 |
|
|
