Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., 4, 2569-2613, 2004
www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/4/2569/2004/
doi:10.5194/acpd-4-2569-2004
© Author(s) 2004. This work is licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 License.
Review Status
This discussion paper has been under review for the journal Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP). Please refer to the corresponding final paper in ACP.
Using GOME NO2 satellite data to examine regional differences in TOMCAT model performance
N. H. Savage1, K. S. Law1,*, J. A. Pyle1, A. Richter2, H. Nüß2, and J. P. Burrows2
1Centre for Atmospheric Science, Chemistry Department, University of Cambridge, UK
2Institute of Environmental Physics, University of Bremen, NW1, Kufsteiner Strasse 1, D-28359 Bremen, Germany
*Now at: Service d’Aeronomie, CNRS/IPSL, Paris, France

Abstract. This paper compares column measurements of NO2 made by the GOME instrument on ERS-2 to model results from the TOMCAT global CTM. The overall correlation between the model and observations is good (0.79 for the whole world, and 0.89 for north America) but the modelled columns are too large over polluted areas (gradient of 1.4 for North America and 1.9 for Europe). NO2 columns in the region of outflow from North America into the Atlantic seem too high in winter in the model compared to the GOME results, whereas the modelled columns are too small off the coast of Africa where there appear to be biomass burning plumes in the satellite data. Several hypotheses are presented to explain these discrepancies. Weaknesses in the model treatment of vertical mixing and chemistry appear to be the most likely explanations. It is shown that GOME and other satellite data will be of great value in furthering our understanding of atmospheric chemistry and in targeting and testing future model development and case studies.

Citation: Savage, N. H., Law, K. S., Pyle, J. A., Richter, A., Nüß, H., and Burrows, J. P.: Using GOME NO2 satellite data to examine regional differences in TOMCAT model performance, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., 4, 2569-2613, doi:10.5194/acpd-4-2569-2004, 2004.
 
Search ACPD
Discussion Paper
    XML
    Citation
    Final Revised Paper
    Share