<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article SYSTEM "http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/inc/acpd/copernicus.dtd">
<article language="en">
	<journal>
		<journal_title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions</journal_title>
		<journal_url>www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net</journal_url>
		<issn>1680-7367</issn>
		<eissn>1680-7375</eissn>
		<volume_number>3</volume_number>
		<issue_number>1</issue_number>
		<publication_year>2003</publication_year>
	</journal>
	<doi>10.5194/acpd-3-413-2003</doi>
	<article_url>http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/3/413/2003/</article_url>
	<abstract_html>http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/3/413/2003/acpd-3-413-2003.html</abstract_html>
	<fulltext_pdf>http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/3/413/2003/acpd-3-413-2003.pdf</fulltext_pdf>
	<start_page>413</start_page>
	<end_page>443</end_page>
	<publication_date>2003-02-03</publication_date>
	<article_title content_type="html">Nitric acid partitioning in cirrus clouds: a synopsis based on field, laboratory and model studies</article_title>
	<authors>
		<author numeration="1" affiliations="1">
			<name>M. Krämer</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="2" affiliations="1">
			<name>J. Beuermann</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="3" affiliations="1">
			<name>C. Schiller</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="4" affiliations="2">
			<name>F. Grimm</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="5" affiliations="2">
			<name>F. Arnold</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="6" affiliations="3">
			<name>T. Peter</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="7" affiliations="4">
			<name>S. Meilinger</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="8" affiliations="5">
			<name>A. Meier</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="9" affiliations="6">
			<name>J. Hendricks</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="10" affiliations="6">
			<name>A. Petzold</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="11" affiliations="6">
			<name>H. Schlager</name>
		</author>
	</authors>
	<affiliations>
		<affiliation numeration="1" content_type="html">FZ Jülich, Institut für Chemie der Geosphäre I: Stratosphäre, Germany</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="2" content_type="html">MPI für Kernphysik, Heidelberg, Atmosphärenphysik, Germany</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="3" content_type="html">ETH Zürich, Institut für Atmosphärenphysik, Switzerland</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="4" content_type="html">MPI für Chemie Mainz, Air Chemistry Department, Germany</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="5" content_type="html">Universität Köln, Inst. für Geophysik &amp; Meteorologie, Germany</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="6" content_type="html">DLR Oberpfaffenhofen, Inst. für Physik der Atmosphäre, Germany</affiliation>
	</affiliations>
	<abstract content_type="html">From a synopsis of field,
      laboratory and model studies at &lt;i&gt;T&lt;/i&gt;&amp;gt;205 K as well as from the
      field experiments POLSTAR at &lt;i&gt;T&lt;/i&gt;&amp;lt;205 K we derive a general picture
      of the partitioning of nitric acid (HNO&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt;) in cirrus clouds and a new
      hypothesis on the uptake of HNO&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt; on ice particles: &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; A substantial part of
      nitric acid remains in the gas phase under cirrus cloud conditions. The
      HNO&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt; removed from the gas phase is distributed between interstitial
      aerosol and ice particles in dependence on the temperature and ice
      surface, respectively. In cold cirrus clouds with small ice surface areas &lt;i&gt;(T
      &lt;/i&gt;&amp;lt;205 K) the partitioning is strongly in favour of interstitial
      ternary solution particles while in warmer cirrus clouds with large ice
      surface areas the uptake on ice dominates. Consequently, denitrification
      via sedimenting ice particles may occur only in the -more frequently
      occurring- warm cirrus clouds &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; The HNO&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt; coverage on ice is
      found to be different for ice particles and ice films. On ice films the
      coverage can increase with decreasing temperature from about 0.1 to 0.8
      monolayer, while that on ice particles is found to decrease with
      temperature and &lt;i&gt;P&lt;/i&gt;&lt;sub&gt;HNO&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;/sub&gt; from 0.1 to 0.001 monolayer. An HNO&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt; uptake
      behaviour following dissociative Langmuir isotherms where the coverage
      decreases for descending temperatures may explain the observations for ice
      particles &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; From a comparison of the
      HNO&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt; measurements with model calculations it is found that (i) the global
      model of Lawrence and Crutzen (1998) overestimates the HNO&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt; partitioning
      in favour of the ice particles (ii) the Langmuir surface chemistry model
      of Tabazadeh et al. (1999) overestimates HNO&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt; coverages for temperatures
      &amp;#x2264;210 K More appropriate coverages are calculated when implementing in
      that model a temperature dependent function for the adsorption free energy
      (&lt;i&gt;&amp;Delta;G&lt;/i&gt;&lt;sub&gt;ads&lt;/sub&gt; &lt;i&gt;(T&lt;/i&gt;)), which is empirically derived
      from the coverage measurements.</abstract>
	<references>
	</references>
</article>

