Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net 1680-7367 1680-7375 2 3 2002 10.5194/acpd-2-905-2002 http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/2/905/2002/ http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/2/905/2002/acpd-2-905-2002.html http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/2/905/2002/acpd-2-905-2002.pdf 905 920 2002-06-24 Ground-based intercomparison of two isoprene measurement techniques E. Leibrock L. G. Huey P. D. Goldan W. C. Kuster E. Williams F. C. Fehsenfeld Aeronomy Laboratory, Environmental Research Labs, NOAA, Boulder, Colorado, USA Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, USA School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA Present address The Boston Consulting Group, Sendlinger Straße 7, D–80331 München, Germany An informal intercomparison of two isoprene (C₅H₈) measurement techniques was carried out during Fall of 1998 at a field site located approximately 3 km west of Boulder, Colorado, USA. A new chemical ionization mass spectrometric technique (CIMS) was compared to a well-established gas chromatographic technique (GC). The CIMS technique utilized benzene cation chemistry to ionize isoprene. The isoprene levels measured by the CIMS were often larger than those obtained with the GC. The results indicate that the CIMS technique suffered from an interference associated with air masses from the Denver, CO metropolitan area. However, the CIMS technique is also demonstrated to be sensitive and fast and is a candidate for isoprene measurements in remote environments near isoprene sources.