Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., 13, 3451-3483, 2013
www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/13/3451/2013/
doi:10.5194/acpd-13-3451-2013
© Author(s) 2013. This work is distributed
under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Review Status
This discussion paper has been under review for the journal Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP). Please refer to the corresponding final paper in ACP.
Relating aerosol absorption due to soot, organic carbon, and dust to emission sources determined from in-situ chemical measurements
A. Cazorla1,*, R. Bahadur2, K. J. Suski1, J. F. Cahill1, D. Chand3, B. Schmid3, V. Ramanathan2, and K. Prather1,2
1Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
2Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
3Atmospheric Science and Global Change Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington, USA
*now at: Departamento de Física Aplicada, Universidad de Granada, Granada, Spain

Abstract. Estimating the aerosol contribution to the global or regional radiative forcing can take advantage of the relationship between the spectral aerosol optical properties and the size and chemical composition of aerosol. Long term global optical measurements from observational networks or satellites can be used in such studies. Using in-situ chemical mixing state measurements can help us to constrain the limitations of such estimates.

In this study, the Absorption Ångström Exponent (AAE) and the Scattering Ångström Exponent (SAE) derived from 10 operational AERONET sites in California are combined for deducing chemical speciation based on wavelength dependence of the optical properties. In addition, in-situ optical properties and single particle chemical composition measured during three aircraft field campaigns in California between 2010 and 2011 are combined in order to validate the methodology used for the estimates of aerosol composition using spectral optical properties.

Results from this study indicate a dominance of mixed types in the classification leading to an underestimation of the primary sources, however secondary sources are better classified. The distinction between carbonaceous aerosols from fossil fuel and biomass burning origins is not clear, since their optical properties are similar. On the other hand, knowledge of the aerosol sources in California from chemical studies help to identify other misclassification such as the dust contribution.


Citation: Cazorla, A., Bahadur, R., Suski, K. J., Cahill, J. F., Chand, D., Schmid, B., Ramanathan, V., and Prather, K.: Relating aerosol absorption due to soot, organic carbon, and dust to emission sources determined from in-situ chemical measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., 13, 3451-3483, doi:10.5194/acpd-13-3451-2013, 2013.
 
Search ACPD
Discussion Paper
    XML
    Citation
    Final Revised Paper
    Share