The absorption Ångström exponent (å<sub>Abs</sub>) of black carbon (BC), or BC internally mixed with non-absorbing material (BC<sub>Int</sub>), is often used to differentiate the contribution of black carbon, dust and brown carbon to light absorption at low-visible wavelengths. This attribution method contains assumptions with uncertainties that have not been formally assessed. We show that the potential range of å<sub>Abs</sub> for BC (or BC<sub>Int</sub>) in the atmosphere can reasonably lead to +7% to −22% uncertainty in BC (or BC<sub>Int</sub>) absorption at 404nm derived from measurements made at 658 nm. These uncertainties propagate to errors in the attributed absorption and mass absorption efficiency (MAE) of brown carbon (BrC). For data collected during a biomass-burning event, the mean uncertainty in MAE at 404 nm attributed to BrC using the å<sub>Abs</sub> method was found to be 34%. In order to yield attributed BrC absorption uncertainties of ±33%, 23% to 41% of total absorption must be sourced from BrC. In light of the potential for introducing significant and poorly constrained errors, we caution against the universal application of the å<sub>Abs</sub> attribution method.