1Institute for Ion Physics and Applied Physics, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
2Atmospheric Chemistry Division, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, USA
3Chemical Sciences Division, NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, CO, USA
4Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences (CIRES), University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA
5Research Application Laboratory, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, USA
6Department of Chemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
*now at: Institute of Meteorology and Geophysics, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
Abstract. We present the first eddy covariance flux measurements of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) using a proton-transfer-reaction time-of-flight mass-spectrometer (PTR-TOF-MS) above a ponderosa pine forest in Colorado, USA. The high mass resolution of the PTR-TOF-MS enabled the identification of chemical sum formulas. During a 30 day measurement period in August and September 2010, 649 different ion mass peaks were detected in the ambient air mass spectrum (including primary ions and mass calibration compounds). Eddy covariance with the vertical wind speed was calculated for all ion mass peaks. On a typical day, 17 ion mass peaks including protonated parent compounds, their fragments and isotopes as well as VOC-H+-water clusters showed a significant flux with daytime average emissions above a reliable flux threshold of 0.1 mg compound m−2 h−1. These ion mass peaks could be assigned to seven compound classes. The main flux contributions during daytime (10:00–18:00 LT) are attributed to the sum of 2-methyl-3-buten-2-ol (MBO) and isoprene (50%), methanol (12%), the sum of acetic acid and glycolaldehyde (10%) and the sum of monoterpenes (10%). The total MBO + isoprene flux was composed of 10% isoprene and 90% MBO.
There was good agreement between the light and temperature dependency of the sum of MBO and isoprene observed for this work and those of earlier studies. The above canopy flux measurements of the sum of MBO and isoprene and the sum of monoterpenes were compared to emissions calculated using the Model of Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature (MEGAN 2.1). The best agreement between MEGAN 2.1 and measurements was reached using emission factors determined from site specific leaf cuvette measurements. While the modelled and measured MBO + isoprene fluxes agree well the emissions of the sum of monoterpenes is underestimated by MEGAN 2.1. This is expected as some factors impacting monoterpene emissions, such as physical damage of needles and branches due to storms, are not included in MEGAN 2.1.
After a severe hailstorm event, 22 ion mass peaks (attributed to six compound classes plus some unknown compounds) showed an elevated flux for the two following days. The sum of monoterpene emissions was 4–23 times higher compared to emissions prior to the hailstorm while MBO emissions remained unchanged. If one heavy storm occurs at this site every month we calculate that the monthly monoterpene emissions (in mg compound m−2) would be underestimated by 40% if this disturbance source is not considered.