Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., 12, 27255-27295, 2012
www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/12/27255/2012/
doi:10.5194/acpd-12-27255-2012
© Author(s) 2012. This work is distributed
under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Review Status
This discussion paper has been under review for the journal Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP). Please refer to the corresponding final paper in ACP.
Receptor modelling of secondary particulate matter at UK sites
A. Charron1, C. Degrendele1,*, B. Laongsri2, and R. M. Harrison2,3
1Institut Français des Sciences et Technologies des Transports, de l'Aménagement et des réseaux, Laboratoire Transport et Environnement, 25 Avenue François Mitterrand Case 24, 69675 Bron Cedex, France
2National Centre for Atmospheric Science, Division of Environmental Health & Risk Management, School of Geography, Earth & Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
3Department of Environmental Sciences/Center of Excellence in Environmental Studies, King Abdulaziz University, P.O. Box 80203, Jeddah, 21589, Saudi Arabia
*now at: RECETOX, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Kamenice 3, 625 00 Brno, Czech Republic

Abstract. Complementary approaches have been taken to better understand the sources and their spatial distribution for secondary inorganic (nitrate and sulphate) and secondary organic aerosol sampled at a rural site (Harwell) in the southern United Kingdom. A concentration field map method was applied to 1581 daily samples of chloride, nitrate and sulphate from 2006 to 2010, and 982 samples for organic carbon and elemental carbon from 2007 to 2010. This revealed a rather similar pattern of sources for nitrate, sulphate and secondary organic carbon within western/central Europe, which in the case of nitrate and sulphate, correlated significantly with EMEP emissions maps of NOx and SO2. A slightly more southerly source emphasis for secondary organic carbon may reflect the contribution of biogenic sources. Trajectory clusters confirm this pattern of behaviour with a major contribution from mainland European sources. Similar behaviours of, on the one hand, sulphate and organic carbon and, on the other hand, EC and nitrate showed that the former are more subject to regional influence than the latter in agreement with the slower atmospheric formation of sulphate and secondary organic aerosol than for nitrate, and the local/mesoscale influences upon primary EC. In a separate study, measurements of sulphate, nitrate, elemental and organic carbon were made in 100 simultaneously collected samples at Harwell and at a suburban site in Birmingham (UK). This showed a significant correlation in concentrations between the two sites for all of the secondary constituents, further indicating secondary organic aerosol to be a regional pollutant behaving similarly to sulphate and nitrate.

Citation: Charron, A., Degrendele, C., Laongsri, B., and Harrison, R. M.: Receptor modelling of secondary particulate matter at UK sites, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., 12, 27255-27295, doi:10.5194/acpd-12-27255-2012, 2012.
 
Search ACPD
Discussion Paper
XML
Citation
Final Revised Paper
Share