Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., 12, 19243-19275, 2012
www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/12/19243/2012/
doi:10.5194/acpd-12-19243-2012
© Author(s) 2012. This work is distributed
under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Review Status
This discussion paper has been under review for the journal Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP). Please refer to the corresponding final paper in ACP.
Effect of aerosols and NO2 concentration on ultraviolet actinic flux near Mexico City during MILAGRO: measurements and model calculations
G. G. Palancar1,2, B. L. Lefer3, S. R. Hall1, W. J. Shaw4, C. A. Corr5, S. C. Herndon6, J. R. Slusser7, and S. Madronich1
1Atmospheric Chemistry Division, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, USA
2INFIQC-CONICET, Departamento de Físico Química, Facultad de Ciencias Químicas, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Centro Láser de Ciencias Moleculares, 5000, Córdoba, Argentina
3Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA
4Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Department of Energy, Richland, WA, USA
5Earth Systems Research Center, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, USA
6Aerodyne Research Inc., Billerica, MA, USA
7UV-B Monitoring and Research Program, USDA, Colorado State University, Ft. Collins, CO, USA

Abstract. Urban air pollution absorbs and scatters solar ultraviolet (UV) radiation, and thus has a potentially large effect on tropospheric photochemical rates. We present the first detailed comparison between UV actinic fluxes (AF) measured in highly polluted conditions and simulated with the Tropospheric Ultraviolet-Visible (TUV) model. Measurements were made during the MILAGRO campaign near Mexico City in March 2006, at a ground-based station near Mexico City (the T1 supersite) and from the NSF/NCAR C-130 aircraft. At the surface, measured AF values are typically smaller than the model by up to 25% in the morning, 10% at noon, and 40% in the afternoon, for pollution-free and cloud-free conditions. When measurements of PBL height, NO2 concentration and aerosols optical properties are included in the model, the agreement improves to within ±10% in the morning and afternoon, and ±3% at noon. Based on daily averages, aerosols account for 67% and NO2 for 25% of AF reductions observed at the surface. Several overpasses from the C-130 aircraft provided the opportunity to examine the AF perturbations aloft, and also show better agreement with the model when aerosol and NO2 effects are included above and below the flight altitude. TUV model simulations show that the vertical structure of the actinic flux is sensitive to the choice of the aerosol single scattering albedo (SSA) at UV wavelengths. Typically, aerosols enhance AF above the PBL and reduce AF near the surface. However, for highly scattering aerosols (SSA > 0.95), enhancements can penetrate well into the PBL, while for strongly absorbing aerosols (SSA < 0.6) reductions in AF are computed in the free troposphere as well as in the PBL. Additional measurements of the SSA at these wavelengths are needed to better constrain the effect of aerosols on the vertical structure of the AF.

Citation: Palancar, G. G., Lefer, B. L., Hall, S. R., Shaw, W. J., Corr, C. A., Herndon, S. C., Slusser, J. R., and Madronich, S.: Effect of aerosols and NO2 concentration on ultraviolet actinic flux near Mexico City during MILAGRO: measurements and model calculations, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., 12, 19243-19275, doi:10.5194/acpd-12-19243-2012, 2012.
 
Search ACPD
Discussion Paper
    XML
    Citation
    Final Revised Paper
    Share