ACPD Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions ACPD 1680-7375 Copernicus GmbH Göttingen, Germany 10.5194/acpd-12-1191-2012 Differences between downscaling with spectral and grid nudging using WRF Liu P. 1 Tsimpidi A. P. 2 Hu Y. 2 Stone B. 3 Russell A. G. 2 Nenes A. 1 4 School of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, 30332, USA School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, 30332, USA School of Architecture, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, 30332, USA School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, 30332, USA 12 01 2012 12 1 1191 1213 This is an open-access article ditributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. This article is available from http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/12/1191/2012/acpd-12-1191-2012.html The full text article is available as a PDF file from http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/12/1191/2012/acpd-12-1191-2012.pdf

Dynamical downscaling has been extensively used to study regional climate forced by large-scale global climate models. During the downscaling process, however, the simulation of regional climate models (RCMs) tends to drift away from the driving fields. Developing a solution that addresses this issue, by retaining the large scale features (from the large-scale fields) and the small-scale features (from the RCMs) has led to the development of "nudging" techniques. Here, we examine the performance of two nudging techniques, grid and spectral nudging, in the downscaling of NCEP/NCAR data using Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Model. The simulations are compared against the results with North America Regional Reanalysis (NARR) data set at different scales of interest. We show that with the appropriate choice of wave numbers, spectral nudging outperforms grid nudging in the capacity of balancing the performance of simulation at the large and small scales.

 References Anthes, R. A.: Regional models of the atmosphere in middle latitudes, Mon. Weather Rev., 111, 1306–1335, 1983. Davies, H. C.: A lateral boundary formulation for multi-level prediction models, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 102, 405–418, 1976. Davies, H. C.: Limitations of some common lateral boundary schemes used in regional NWP models, Mon. Weather Rev., 111, 1002–1012, 1983. Denis, B., Laprise, J., Caya, D., and Côté,J.: Downscaling ability of one-way nested regional models: The big-brother experiment, Clim. Dyn., 18, 627–646, 2002. Dickinson, R. E., Errico, R. M., Giorgi, F., and Bates, G. T.: A regional climate model for the western United States, Climate Change, 15, 383–422, 1989. Forkel, R. and Knoche, R.: Regional climate change and its impact on photooxidant concentrations in southern Germany: Simulation with a coupled regional climate-chemistry model, J. Geophys. Res., 111, D12302, http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006748doi:10.1029/2005JD006748, 2006. Giorgi, F. and Mearns, L. O.: Introduction to special section: regional climate modeling revisited, J. Geophys. Res., 104, D6, http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/1998JD200042doi:10.1029/1998JD200042, 1999. Gustafson, W. I. and Leung, L. R.: Regonal downscaling for air quality assessment. A reasonable proposition? , Am. Meteorol. Soc., 1215–1227, 2007. Hogrefe, C., Lynn, B., Civerolo, K., Ku, J. Y., Rosenthal, J., Rosenzweig, C., Goldberg, R., Gaffin, S., Knowlton, K., and Kinney, P. L.: Simulation changes in regional air pollution over the eastern United States due to changes in global and regional climate and emissions, J. Geophys. Res., 109, D22301, http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2004JD004690doi:10.1029/2004JD004690, 2004. Houghton, J. T., Ding, Y., Griggs, D. J., Noguer, M., van der Linden, P. J., Dai, X., Maskell, K., and Johnson, C. A.: Climate Change 2001: the Science Basis, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK, 944 pp., 2001. IPCC, Climate Change 2007: The physical science basis, in: Contribution of the Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by: Solomon, S., Qin, D., Manning, M., Chen, Z., Marquis, M., Averyt, K. B., Tignor, M., and Miller, H. L., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2007. Leung, L. R. and Gustafson, W. I.: Potential regional climate change and implications to US air quality, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L16711, http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005GL022911doi:10.1029/2005GL022911, 2005. Meehl, G. A., Stocker, T. F., Collins, W. D., Friedlingstein, P., Gaye, A. T., Gregory, J. M., Kitoh, A., Knutti, R., Murphy, J. M., Noda, A., Raper, S. C. B., Watterson, I. G., Weaver, A. J., and Zhao, Z. C.: Global climate projections, in: Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis – Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Inter-governmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK, 747–845, 2007. Mesinger, F., DiMego, G., Kalnay, E., Mitchell, K., Shafran, P. C., Ebisuzaki, W., Jovic, D., Woollen, J., Rogers, E., Berbery, E. H., Ek, M. B., Fan, Y., Grumbine, R., Higgins, W., Li, H., Lin, Y., Manikin, G., Parrish, D., and Shi, W.: North American regional reanalysis, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc.,87, 343–360, 2006. Miguez-Macho, G.: Spectral nudging to eliminate the effects of domain position and geometry in regional climate model simulations, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 109, D13104, http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2003JD004495doi:10.1029/2003JD004495, 2004. Miguez-Macho, G.: Regional climate simulations over North America: Interaction of local processes with improved large-scale flow, J. Climate, 18, 1227–1246, 2005. Noguer, M., Jones, R., and Murphy, J.: Sources of systematic errors in the climatology of a regional climate model over Europe, Clim. Dynam., 14, 691–712, 1998. Rockel, B., Castro, C. L., Pielke Sr., R. A., von Storch, H., and Leoncini, G.: Dynamical downscaling: Assessment of model system dependent retained and added variability for two different regional climate models, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D21107, http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009461doi:10.1029/2007JD009461, 2008. Skamarock, W. C., Klemp, J., Dudhia, J., Gill, D. O., Barker, D. M., Duda, M. G., Huang, X. Y., Wang, W., and Powers, J. G.: A Description of the Advanced Research WRF Version 3, NCAR Technical note NCARTN-475+STR, 2008. Staniforth, A.: Regional modeling: A theoretical discussion, Moteor. Atmos. Phys., 63, 15–29, 1997. Stauffer, D. R. and Seaman, N. L.: Use of four-dimensional data assimilation in a limited-area mesoscale model, Part I: Experiments with synoptic-scale data, Mon. Weather Rev., 118, 1250–1277, 1990. Steiner, A. L., Tonse, S., Cohen, R. C., Goldstein, A. H., and Harley, R. A.: Influence of future climate and emissions on regional air quality in California, Geophys. Res., 111, D18303, http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006935doi:10.1029/2005JD006935, 2006. Tagaris, E., Liao, K.-J., Manomaiphiboon, K., He, S., Woo, J.-H., Amar, P., and Russell, A. G.: The role of climate and emission changes in future air quality over southern Canada and northern Mexico, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 3973–3983, http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-3973-2008doi:10.5194/acp-8-3973-2008, 2008. von Storch, H., Langenberg, H., and Feser, F.: A spectral nudging technique for dynamical downscaling purposes, Mon. Weather. Rev., 128, 3664–3673, 2000. Waldron, K. M., Paegle, J., and Horel, J. D.: Sensitivity of a spectrally filtered and nudged limited-area model to outer model options, Mon. Weather. Rev., 124, 529–547, 1996. Warner, T. T., Peterson, R. A., and Treadon, R. E.: A tutorial on lateral boundary conditions as a basic and potential serious limitation to regional numerical weather prediction, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 78, 2599–2617, 1997.