References

ACPD

Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions

ACPD

1680-7375

Copernicus GmbH

Göttingen, Germany

10.5194/acpd-12-10059-2012

Are simulated aerosol-induced effects on deep convective clouds strongly dependent on saturation adjustment?

Lebo

Z. J.

¹ Morrison

² Seinfeld

J. H.

¹ ³

Environmental Science and Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, 91125, CA, USA

Mesoscale and Microscale Meteorology Division, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, 80307, CO, USA

Chemical Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, 91125, CA, USA

19 04 2012

12 4 10059 10114

This is an open-access article ditributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

This article is available from http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/12/10059/2012/acpd-12-10059-2012.html

The full text article is available as a PDF file from http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/12/10059/2012/acpd-12-10059-2012.pdf

Three configurations of a bulk microphysics scheme in conjunction with a detailed bin scheme are implemented in the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model to specifically address the role of the saturation adjustment assumption (i.e., condensing/evaporating the surplus/deficit water vapor relative to saturation in one time step) on aerosol-induced invigoration of deep convective clouds. The bulk model configurations are designed to treat cloud droplet condensation/evaporation using either saturation adjustment, as employed in most bulk models, or an explicit representation of supersaturation over a time step, as used in bin models. Results demonstrate that the use of saturation adjustment artificially enhances condensation and latent heating at low levels and limits the potential for an increase in aerosol concentration to increase buoyancy at mid to upper levels. This leads to a small weakening of the time- and domain-averaged convective mass flux (~ -3%) in polluted compared to clean conditions. In contrast, the bin model and bulk scheme with explicit prediction of supersaturation simulate an increase in latent heating aloft and the convective updraft mass flux is weakly invigorated (~5%). The bin model also produces a large increase in domain-mean cumulative surface precipitation in polluted conditions (~18%), while all of the bulk model configurations simulate little change in precipitation. Finally, it is shown that the cold pool weakens substantially with increased aerosol loading when saturation adjustment is applied, which acts to reduce the low-level convergence and weaken the convective dynamics. With an explicit treatment of supersaturation in the bulk and bin models there is little change in cold pool strength, so that the convective response to polluted conditions is influenced more by changes in latent heating aloft. It is concluded that the use of saturation adjustment can explain differences in the response of cold pool evolution and convective dynamics with aerosol loading simulated by the bulk and bin models, but cannot explain large differences in the response of surface precipitation between these models.

References 1

%Albrecht, B.: Aerosols, cloud microphysics, and fractional cloudiness, Science, % 245, 1227–1230, \doi10.1126/science.245.4923.1227, 1989. % %

%Chuang, P Y., Charlson, R J., and Seinfeld, J H.: Kinetic limitations on % droplet formation in clouds, Nature, 390, 94–96, 1997. % %

%Clark, T L.: Numerical Modeling of the Dynamics and Microphysics of Warm % Cumulus Convection, J. Atmos. Sci., 30, 857–878, 1973. % %

%Dawson II, D T., Xue, M., Milbrandt, J A., and Yau, M K.: Comparison of % evaporation and cold pool development between single-moment and multi-moment % bulk microphysics schemes in idealized simulations of tornadic thunderstorms, % Mon. Wea. Rev., 138, 1152–1171, 2010. % %

%Ekman, A. M L., Engstrom, A., and Soderberg, A.: Impact of two-way % aerosol-cloud interaction and changes in aerosol size distribution on % simulated aerosol-induced deep convective cloud sensitivity, J. Atmos. Sci., % 68, 685–697, 2011. % %

%Fan, J., Zhang, R., Li, G., and Tao, W.-K.: Effects of aerosols and relative % humidity on cumulus clouds, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D14204, % \doi10.1029/2006JD008136, 2007. % %

%Fan, J., Yuan, T., Comstock, J M., Ghan, S., Khain, A., Leung, L R., Li, Z., % Martins, V J., and Ovchinnikov, M.: Dominant role by vertical wind shear in % regulating aerosol effects on deep convective clouds, J. Geophys. Res., 114, D22206, % \doi10.1029/2009JD012352, 2009. % %

%Fan, J., Leung, L R., Li, Z., Morrison, H., Chen, H., Zhou, Y., Qian, Y., and % Wang, Y.: Aerosol impacts on clouds and precipitation in easter China: % Results form bin and bulk microphysics, J. Geophys. Res., 117, D00K36, % \doi10.1029/2011JD016537, 2012. % %

%Grabowski, W W.: Indirect Impact of Atmospheric Aerosol in Idealized % Simulations of Convective-Radiative Quasi Equilibrium., J. Climate, 19, % 4664–4682, 2006. % %

%Grabowski, W W. and Morrison, H.: Indirect Impact of Atmospheric Aerosol in % Idealized Simulations of Convective-Radiative Quasi Equilibrium. Part II: % Double-moment microphysics, J. Climate, 24, 1897–1912, 2011. % %

%Gunn, R. and Phillips, B B.: An experiment investigation of the effect of air % pollution on the initiation of rain, J. Meteor., 14, 272–280, 1956. % %

%Hallett, J. and Mossop, S C.: Production of secondary ice particles during the % riming process, Nature, 249, 26–28, \doi10.1038/249026a0, 1974. % %

%Harrington, J Y., Feingold, G., and Cotton, W R.: Radiative impacts on the % growth of a population of drops within simulated summertime Arctic stratus, % J. Atmos. Sci., 57, 766–785, 2000. % %

%Houze, R A.: Cloud Dynamics, vol 53 of \em International Geophysics % Series\/, Academic Press, Inc., San Diego, California, USA, 1993. % %

%James, R P. and Markowski, P M.: A numerical investigation of the effects of % dry air aloft on deep convection, Mon. Wea. Rev., 138, 140–161, 2010. % %

%Khain, A. and Lynn, B.: Simulation of a supercell storm in clean and dirty % atmosphere using weather research and forecasting model with spectral bin % microphysics, J. Geophys. Res., 114, D19209, \doi10.1029/2009JD011827, 2009. % %

%Khain, A. and Pokrovsky, A.: Simulation of effects of atmospheric aerosols on % deep turbulent convective clouds using a spectral microphysics mixed-phase % cumulus cloud model. Part II: Sensitivity study, J. Atmos. Sci., 61, % 2983–3001, 2004. % %

%Khain, A., Pokrovsky, A., Pinsky, M., Seifert, A., and Phillips, V.: Simulation % of effects of atmospheric aerosols on deep turbulent convective clouds using % a spectral microphysics mixed-phase cumulus cloud model. Part I: Model % description and possible applications, J. Atmos. Sci., 161, 2963–2982, 2004. % %

%Khain, A., Rosenfeld, D., and Pokrovsky, A.: Aerosol impact on the dynamics and % microphysics of deep convective clouds, Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 131, 611, % 2639–2663, \doi10.1256//qj.04.62, 2005. % %

%Khain, A., BenMoshe, N., and Pokrovsky, A.: Factors Determining the Impact of % Aerosols on Surface Precipitation from Clouds: An Attempt at Classification, % J. Atmos. Sci., 65, 1721–1748, 2008. % %

%Klemp, J B.: Dynamics of tornadic thunderstorms, Am. Rev. Fluid Mech., 19, % 369–402, 1987. % %

%Koren, I., Kaufman, Y J., Rosenfeld, D., Remer, L A., and Rudich, Y.: Aerosol % invigoration and restructuring of Atlantic convective clouds, Geophys. Res. % Let., 32, L14828, \doi10.1029/2005GL023187, 2005. % %

%Koren, I., Remer, L A., Altaratz, O., Martins, J V., and Davidi, A.: % Aerosol-induced changes of convective cloud anvils produce climate warming, % Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 5001–5010, \doi10.5194/acp-10-5001-2010, 2010. % %

%Lebo, Z J. and Seinfeld, J H.: Theoretical basis for convective invigoration % due to increased aerosol concentration, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 5407–5429, % \doi10.5194/acp-11-5407-2011, 2011. % %

%Lee, S S.: Dependence of aerosol-precipitation interactions on humidity in a % multiple-cloud system, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 2179–2196, % \doi10.5194/acp-11-2179-2011, 2011. % %

%Lee, S S., Donner, L J., Phillips, V. T J., and Ming, Y.: Examination of % aerosol effects on precipitation in deep convective clouds during the 1997 % ARM summer experiment, Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 134, 1201–1220, % \doi10.1002/qj.287, 2008a. % %

%Lee, S S., Donner, L J., Phillips, V. T J., and Ming, Y.: The dependence of % aerosol effects on clouds and precipitation on cloud-system organization, % shear and stability, J. Geophys. Res., 113, \doi10.1029/2007JD009224, % 2008b. % %

%Li, G., Wang, Y., Lee, K.-H., Diao, Y., and Zhang, R.: Impacts of aerosols on % the development and precipitation of a mesoscale squall line, J. Geophys. % Res., 114, \doi10.1029/2008JD011581, 2009. % %

%Milbrandt, J A. and Yau, M K.: A multi-moment bulk micriphysics % parameterization. Part IV: Sensitivity experiments, J. Atmos. Sci., 63, % 3137–3159, 2006. % %

%Mitchel, D L.: Use of Mass- and area-dimensional power laws for determining % precipitation particle terminal velocities, J. Atmos. Sci., 53, 1710–1713, % 1996. % %

%Morrison, H.: On the robustness of aerosol effects on an idealized supercell % storm simulated with a cloud system-resolving model, Atmos. Chem. Phys. % Disc., 12, submitted, 2012. % %

%Morrison, H. and Grabowski, W W.: Modeling supersaturation and sub-grid scale % mixing with two-moment warm bulk microphysics, J. Atmos. Sci., 65, 792–812, % 2008. % %

%Morrison, H. and Milbrandt, J A.: Comparison of two-moment bulk microphysics % schemes in idealized supercell thunderstorm simulations, Mon. Wea. Rev., 139, % 1103–1130, 2011. % %

%Morrison, H., Thompson, G., and Tatarskii, V.: Impact of Cloud Microphysics on % the Development of Trailing Stratiform Precipitation in a Simulated Squall % Line: Comparison of One- and Two-Moment Schemes, Mon. Wea. Rev., 137, % 991–1007, 2009. % %

%Noppel, H., Blahak, U., Seifert, A., and Beheng, K D.: Simulations of a % hailstorm and the impact of CCN using an advanced two-moment cloud % microphysics scheme, Atmos. Res., 96, 286–301, 2010. % %

%Pruppacher, H R. and Klett, J D.: Microphysics of Clouds and Precipitation, % Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, 1997. % %

%Reisin, T., Levin, Z., and Tzivion, S.: Rain production in convective clouds as % simulated in an axisymmetric model with detailed microphysics. Part I: % Description of the model, J. Atmos. Sci., 53, 497–519, 1996. % %

%Rosenfeld, D., Lohmann, U., Raga, G B., O'Dowd, C D., Kulmala, M., Fuzzi, S., % Reissell, A., and Andreae, M O.: Flood or Drought: How do aerosols affect % precipitation?, Science, 321, 1309–1313, 2008. % %

%Rotunno, R., Klemp, J B., and Weisman, M L.: A theory for strong, long-lived % squall lines, J. Atmos. Sci., 45, 463–485, 1988. % %

%Seifert, A. and Beheng, K D.: A two-moment cloud microphysics parameterization % for mixed-phase clouds. Part 2: Maritime vs. continental deep convective % storms, Meteor. Atmos. Phys., 92, 45–66, 2006. % %

%Seifert, A., Köhler, C., and Beheng, K D.: Aerosol-cloud-precipitation % effects over Germany as simulated by a convective-scale numerical weather % prediction model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 709–725, % \doi10.5194/acp-12-709-2012, 2012. % %

%Skamarock, W C., Klemp, J B., Dudhia, J., Gill, D O., Barker, D M., Duda, % M G., Huang, X.-Y., Wang, W., and Powers, J G.: A description of the % advanced research WRF Version 3, National Center for Atmospheric Research, % Boulder, Colorado, USA, 2008. % %

%Squires, P.: The microstructure and Colloidal Stability of Warm Clouds: Part % I – The Relation between Structure and Stability, Tellus, 10, 256–261, % 1958. % %

%Stevens, B. and Feingold, G.: Untangling aerosol effects on clouds and % precipitation in a buffered system, Nature, 461, 607–613, % \doi10.1038/nature08281, 2009. % %

%Stevens, B., Feingold, G., Cotton, W R., and Walko, R L.: Elements of the % microphysical structure of numerically simulated nonprecipitating % stratocumulus, J. Atmos. Sci., 53, 980–1006, 1996. % %

%Tao, W.-K., Li, X., Khain, A., Matsui, T., Lang, S., and Simpson, J.: Role of % atmospheric aerosol concentration on deep convective precipitation: % Cloud-resolving model simulations, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D24S18, % \doi10.1029/2007JD008728, 2007. % %

%Teller, A. and Levin, Z.: The effects of aerosols on precipitation and % dimensions of subtropical clouds: a sensitivity study using a numerical cloud % model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 67–80, 2006. % %

%Van den Heever, S C. and Cotton, W R.: The impact of hail size on simulated % supercell storms, J. Atmos. Sci., 61, 1596–1609, 2004. % %

%Van den Heever, S C. and Cotton, W R.: Urban Aerosol Impacts on Downwind % Convective Storms, J. Appl. Meteor. Clim., 46, 828–850, 2007. % %

%Van den Heever, S C., Carri, G G., Cotton, W R., DeMott, P J., and % Prenni, A J.: Impacts of Nucleating Aerosol on Florida Storms. Part I: % Mesoscale Simulations, J. Atmos. Sci., 63, 1752–1775, 2006. % %

%Van den Heever, S C., Stephens, G L., and Wood, N B.: Aerosol indirect % effects on tropical convection characteristics under conditions of % radiative-convective equilibrium, J. Atmos. Sci., 68, 699–718, 2011. % %

%Wang, C.: A modeling study of the response of tropical deep convection to the % increase of cloud condensation nuclei concentration: 1. Dynamics and % microphysics, J. Geophys. Res., 110, D21211, \doi10.1029/2004JD005720, 2005. % %

%Weisman, M L. and Klemp, J B.: The dependence of numerically simulated % convective storms on vertical wind shear and buoyancy, Mon. Wea. Rev., 110, % 504–520, 1982. % %

%Weisman, M L. and Klemp, J B.: The structure and classification of % numerically simulations convective storms in directionally varying wind % shears, Mon. Wea. Rev., 112, 2479–2498, 1984. % %

%Weisman, M L. and Rotunno, R.: "A theory for strong long-lived squall lines" % revisited, J. Atmos. Sci., 61, 361–382, 2004. % %

%Xue, H. and Feingold, G.: Large-eddy simulations of trade wind cumulus: % Investigation of aerosol indirect effects, J. Atmos. Sci., 63, 1605–1622, % 2006. % %