Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., 11, 8801-8840, 2011
www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/11/8801/2011/
doi:10.5194/acpd-11-8801-2011
© Author(s) 2011. This work is distributed
under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Review Status
This discussion paper has been under review for the journal Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP). Please refer to the corresponding final paper in ACP.
Cloud condensation nuclei closure study on summer arctic aerosol
M. Martin1, R. Y.-W. Chang2, B. Sierau1, S. Sjogren3, E. Swietlicki3, J. P. D. Abbatt2, C. Leck4, and U. Lohmann1
1Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
2Department of Chemistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
3Division of Nuclear Physics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
4Department of Meteorology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden

Abstract. We present an aerosol – cloud condensation nuclei CCN) closure study on summer high Arctic aerosol based on measurements that were carried out in summer 2008 during the Arctic Summer Cloud Ocean Study (ASCOS) on board the Swedish ice breaker Oden. The data presented here were collected during a three-week time period in the pack ice (>85° N) when the icebreaker Oden was moored to an ice floe and drifted passively during the most biological active period into autumn freeze up conditions.

CCN number concentrations were obtained using two CCN counters measuring at different supersaturations. The directly measured CCN number concentration is then compared with a CCN number concentration calculated using both bulk aerosol mass composition data from an aerosol mass spectrometer and aerosol number size distributions obtained from a differential mobility particle sizer, assuming κ-Köhler theory and an internally mixed aerosol.

For the two highest measured supersaturations, 0.73 and 0.41%, closure could not be achieved with the investigated settings concerning hygroscopicity and density. The calculated CCN number concentration was always higher than the measured one. One possible explanation is that the smaller particles that activate at these supersaturations have a relative larger insoluble organic mass fraction and thus are less good CCN than the larger particles. At 0.20, 0.15 and 0.10% supersaturation, the measured CCN number can be represented with different parameters for the hygroscopicity and density of the particles. For the best agreement of the calculated CCNnumber concentration with the measured one the organic fraction of the aerosol needs to be nearly insoluble (қorg=0.02). However, this is not unambigious and қorg=0.2 is found as an upper limit at 0.1% supersaturation.


Citation: Martin, M., Chang, R. Y.-W., Sierau, B., Sjogren, S., Swietlicki, E., Abbatt, J. P. D., Leck, C., and Lohmann, U.: Cloud condensation nuclei closure study on summer arctic aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., 11, 8801-8840, doi:10.5194/acpd-11-8801-2011, 2011.
 
Search ACPD
Discussion Paper
    XML
    Citation
    Final Revised Paper
    Share