Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., 11, 22909-22950, 2011
www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/11/22909/2011/
doi:10.5194/acpd-11-22909-2011
© Author(s) 2011. This work is distributed
under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Review Status
This discussion paper has been under review for the journal Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP). Please refer to the corresponding final paper in ACP.
Receptor modeling of near-roadway aerosol mass spectrometer data in Las Vegas, Nevada, with EPA PMF
S. G. Brown1,2, T. Lee2, G. A. Norris3, P. T. Roberts1, J. L. Collett Jr.2, P. Paatero4, and D. R. Worsnop5
1Sonoma Technology, Inc., Petaluma, California, USA
2Colorado State University, Atmospheric Science Department, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
3US EPA, Office of Research and Development, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA
4University of Helsinki, Dept. of Physics, Helsinki, Finland
5Aerodyne Research, Billerica, Massachusetts, USA

Abstract. Ambient non-refractory PM1 aerosol particles were measured with an Aerodyne High Resolution Time-of-Flight Aerosol Mass Spectrometer (HR-AMS) at an elementary school 20 m from the US 95 freeway in Las Vegas, Nevada, during January 2008. Additional collocated continuous measurements of black carbon (BC), carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen oxides (NOx), and meteorological data were collected. The US Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) positive matrix factorization (PMF) data analysis tool was used to apportion organic matter (OM) as measured by HR-AMS, and rotational tools in EPA PMF were used to better characterize the solution space and pull resolved factors toward known source profiles. Three- to six-factor solutions were resolved. The four-factor solution was the most interpretable, with the typical AMS PMF factors of hydrocarbon-like organic aerosol (HOA), low-volatility oxygenated organic aerosol (LV-OOA), biomass burning organic aerosol (BBOA), and semi-volatile oxygenated organic aerosol (SV-OOA). When the measurement site was downwind of the freeway, HOA composed about half the OM, with SV-OOA and LV-OOA accounting for the rest. Attempts to pull the PMF factor profiles toward source profiles were successful but did not qualitatively change the results, indicating that these factors are very stable. Oblique edges were present in G-space plots, suggesting that the obtained rotation may not be the most plausible one. Since solutions found by pulling the profiles or using Fpeak retained these oblique edges, there appears to be little rotational freedom in the base solution. On average, HOA made up 26 % of the OM, and it made up nearly half of the OM when the monitoring site was downwind of US 95 during morning rush hour. LV-OOA was highest in the afternoon and accounted for 26 % of the OM. BBOA occurred in the evening hours, was predominantly from the residential area to the north, and on average constituted 12 % of the OM; SV-OOA accounted for the remaining third of the OM. Use of the pulling techniques available in EPA PMF and ME-2 suggested that the four-factor solution was very stable.

Citation: Brown, S. G., Lee, T., Norris, G. A., Roberts, P. T., Collett Jr., J. L., Paatero, P., and Worsnop, D. R.: Receptor modeling of near-roadway aerosol mass spectrometer data in Las Vegas, Nevada, with EPA PMF, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., 11, 22909-22950, doi:10.5194/acpd-11-22909-2011, 2011.
 
Search ACPD
Discussion Paper
XML
Citation
Final Revised Paper
Share