References

ACPD

Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions

ACPD

1680-7375

Copernicus GmbH

Göttingen, Germany

10.5194/acpd-10-9219-2010

Updraft and downdraft characterization with Doppler lidar: cloud-free versus cumuli-topped mixed-layer

Ansmann

¹ Fruntke

¹ Engelmann

Leibniz Institute for Tropospheric Research, Permoserstr. 15, 04318 Leipzig, Germany

13 04 2010

10 4 9219 9252

This is an open-access article ditributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

This article is available from http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/10/9219/2010/acpd-10-9219-2010.html

The full text article is available as a PDF file from http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/10/9219/2010/acpd-10-9219-2010.pdf

For the first time, a comprehensive, height-resolved Doppler lidar study of updrafts and downdrafts in the mixing layer is presented. The Doppler lidar measurements were performed at Leipzig, Germany, in the summer half year of 2006. The conditional sampling method is applied to the measured vertical velocities to identify, count, and analyze significant updraft and downdraft events. Three cases of boundary layer evolution with and without fair weather cumuli formation are discussed. Updrafts occur with an average frequency of 1–2 per unit length zi (boundary layer depth zi), downdrafts 20%–30% more frequently. In the case with cumuli formation, the draft occurrence frequency is enhanced by about 50% at cloud level or near cloud base. The counted updraft events cover 30%–34%, downdrafts 53%–57% of the velocity time series during the main period of convective activity. By considering all drafts with horizontal extent >36 m in the analysis, the updraft mean horizontal extent ranges from 200–350 m and is about 0.15zi in all three cases. Downdrafts are a factor of 1.3–1.5 larger. The average value of the updraft mean vertical velocities is 0.5–0.7 m/s or 0.4w&lowast; (convective velocity scale w&lowast;), and the negative downdraft mean vertical velocities are weaker by roughly 10%–20%. The analysis of the relationship between the size (horizontal extent) of the updrafts and downdrafts and their mean vertical velocity reveals a pronounced increase of the average vertical velocity in updrafts from 0.4–0.5 m/s for small thermals (100–200 m) to about 1.5 m/s for large updrafts (>600 m) in the case with fair weather cumuli. At cloudless conditions, the updraft velocities were found to be 20% smaller for the large thermals.

References 1

Ansmann, A., Tesche, M., Knippertz, P., Bierwirth, E., Althausen, D., Müller, D., and Schulz, O.: Vertical profiling of convective dust plumes in southern Morocco during SAMUM, Tellus B, 61, 340–353, 2009.

Baars, H., Ansmann, A., Engelmann, R., and Althausen, D.: Continuous monitoring of the boundary-layer top with lidar, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 7281–7296, 2008.

Bösenberg, J. and Linné, H.: Laser remote sensing of the planetary boundary layer, Meteorol. Z., 11, 233–240, 2002.

Drobinski, P., Carlotti, P., Newsom, R K., Banta, R M., Foster, R C., and Redelsperger, J.-L.: The structure of the near-neutral atmospheric surface layer, J. Atmos. Sci., 61, 699–714, 2004.

Durand, P., Thoumieux, F., and Lambert, D.: Turbulent length–scales in the marine atmospheric mixed layer, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 126, 1889–1912, 2000.

Engelmann, R.: Aerosol vertical exchange in the convective planetary boundary layer, Dissertation, University of Leipzig, 2009.

Engelmann, R., Wandinger, U., Ansmann, A., Müller, D., Zeromskis, E., Althausen, D., and Wehner, B.: Lidar observations of the vertical aerosol flux in the planetary boundary layer, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 25, 1296–1306, 2008.

Fruntke, J.: Charaktersierung der Grenzschicht anhand von Vertikalwindmessungen mit einem Doppler–Lidar, (Characterization of the boundary layer by means of vertical wind measurements with Doppler lidar), Diploma thesis, University of Leipzig, 2009.

Gibert, F., Cuesta, J., Yano, J.-I., Arnault, N., and Flamant, P H.: On the correlation between convective plume updrafts and downdrafts, lidar reflectivity and depolarization ratio, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 125, 553–573, 2007.

Godowitch, J M.: Characteristics of vertical turbulent velocities in the urban convective boundary layer, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 35, 387–407, 1986.

Greenhut, G K. and Khalsa, S. J S.: Updraft and downdraft events in the atmospheric boundary layer over the equatorial Pacific Ocean, J. Atmos. Sci., 39, 1803–1817, 1982.

Greenhut, G K. and Khalsa, S. J S.: Convective elements in the marine atmospheric boundary layer. Part I: conditional sampling studies, J. Clim. Appl. Meteorol., 26, 813–822, 1987.

Grund, C J., Banta, R M., George, J L., Howell, J N., Post, M J., Richter, R A., and Weickmann, A M.: High-resolution Doppler lidar for boundary layer and cloud research, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 18, 376–393, 2001.

Hogan, R J., Grant, A. L M., Illingworth, A J., Pearson, G N., and O'Connor, E J.: Vertical velocity variance and skewness in clear and cloud-topped boundary layers as revealed by Doppler lidar, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 135, 635–643, 2009.

Khalsa, S. J S. and Greenhut, G K.: Conditional sampling of updrafts and downdrafts in the marine atmospheric boundary layer, J. Atmos. Sci., 42, 2550–2562, 1985.

Kollias, P., Albrecht, B A., Lhermitte, R., and Savtchenko, A.: Radar observations of updrafts, downdrafts, and turbulence in fair-weather cumuli, J. Atmos. Sci., 58, 1750–1766, 2001.

Lenschow, D H.: Airplane measurements of planetary boundary layer structure, J. Appl. Meteorol., 9, 874–884, 1970.

Lenschow, D H. and Stephens, P L.: The role of thermals in the convective boundary layer, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 19, 509–532, 1980.

Lenschow, D H. and Stephens, P L.: Mean vertical velocity and turbulence intensity inside and outside thermals, Atmos. Environ., 16, 61–64, 1982.

Lenschow, D H., Mann, J., and Kristensen, L.: How long is long enough when measuring fluxes and other turbulence statistics?, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 11, 661–673, 1994.

Lothon, M., Lenschow, D H., and Mayor, S D.: Coherence and scale of vertical velocity in the convective boundary layer from Doppler lidar, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 35, 387–407, 1986.

Moeng, C.-H. and Rotunno, R.: Vertical–velocity skewness in the buoyancy–driven boundary layer, J. Atmos. Sci., 47, 1149–1162, 1990.

Said, F., Canut, G., Durand, P., Lohou, F., and Lothon, M.: Seasonal evolution of boundary–layer turbulence measured by aircraft during the AMMA 2006 Special Observation Period, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 135, 47–65 , 2010.

Schumann, U. and Moeng, C.-H.: Plume fluxes in clear and cloudy convective boundary layers, J. Atmos. Sci., 48, 1746–1757, 1991.

Seifert, P., Engelmann, R., Ansmann, A., Wandinger, U., Mattis, I., Althausen, D., and Fruntke, J.: Characterization of specular reflections in mixed–phase and ice clouds based on scanning, polarization, and Raman lidar, in: Reviewed and revised papers presented at the 24th International Laser Radar Conference, 23–28 June 2008, Boulder, Colorado, USA, edited by: Hardesty, M. and Mayor, S., 571–574, NOAA, Boulder, Co, ISBN 978-0-615-21489-4, 2008.

Stull, R B.: An Introduction to Boundary Layer Meteorology, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 666~pp., 1988.

Williams, A G. and Hacker, J M.: The composite shape and structure of coherent eddies in the convective boundary layer, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 61, 213–245, 1992.

Wulfmeyer, V. and Janjić, T.: Twenty-four-hour observations of the marine boundary layer using shipborne NOAA high-resoultion Doppler lidar, J. Appl. Meteorol., 44, 1723–1744, 2005.

Young, G S.: Turbulence structure of the convective boundary layer. Part I: variability of normalized turbulence statistics, J. Atmos. Sci., 45, 719–726, 1988a.

Young, G S.: Turbulence structure of the convective boundary layer. Part II: Phoenix 78 aircraft observations of thermals and their environment, J. Atmos. Sci., 45, 727–735, 1988b.

Young, G S.: Convection in the atmospheric boundary layer, Earth-Sci. Rev., 25, 179–198, 1988c.