Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., 10, 8487-8513, 2010
www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/10/8487/2010/
doi:10.5194/acpd-10-8487-2010
© Author(s) 2010. This work is distributed
under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Review Status
This discussion paper has been under review for the journal Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP). Please refer to the corresponding final paper in ACP.
Technical note: Vapor pressure estimation methods applied to secondary organic aerosol constituents from α-pinene oxidation: an intercomparison study
S. Compernolle, K. Ceulemans, and J.-F. Müller
Belgian Institute for Space-aeronomy, Ringlaan 3, 1180 Brussels, Belgium

Abstract. We applied and compared seven vapor pressure estimation methods to the condensable compounds generated in the oxidation of α-pinene, as described by the state-of-the-art mechanism of the BOREAM model (Capouet et al., 2008). Several of these methods had to be extended in order to treat functional groups such as hydroperoxides and peroxy acyl nitrates. Large differences in the estimated vapor pressures are reported, which will inevitably lead to large differences in aerosol formation simulations. Cautioning remarks are given for some vapor pressure estimation methods.

Citation: Compernolle, S., Ceulemans, K., and Müller, J.-F.: Technical note: Vapor pressure estimation methods applied to secondary organic aerosol constituents from α-pinene oxidation: an intercomparison study, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., 10, 8487-8513, doi:10.5194/acpd-10-8487-2010, 2010.
 
Search ACPD
Discussion Paper
    XML
    Citation
    Final Revised Paper
    Share