Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., 10, 2503-2548, 2010
www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/10/2503/2010/
doi:10.5194/acpd-10-2503-2010
© Author(s) 2010. This work is distributed
under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Review Status
This discussion paper has been under review for the journal Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP). Please refer to the corresponding final paper in ACP.
Uncertainty assessment of current size-resolved parameterizations for below-cloud particle scavenging by rain
X. Wang1, L. Zhang2, and M. D. Moran2
1Kellys Environmental Services, 40 Fountainhead Rd., Suite 1806, Toronto, ON, M3J 2V1, Canada
2Air Quality Research Division, Science and Technology Branch, Environment Canada, 4905 Dufferin Street, Toronto, ON, M3H 5T4, Canada

Abstract. A detailed review has been conducted of current size-resolved parameterizations of below-cloud scavenging by rain, including their formulation in terms of scavenging coefficient (Λ), their associated input parameters and comparisons with size-resolved Λ values obtained from field measurements. The three dominant factors in the theoretical formulations of Λ – raindrop-particle collection efficiency, raindrop number size distribution and raindrop terminal fall velocity – are investigated through numerical sensitivity tests. It is found that the use of different formulations for raindrop-particle collection efficiency can cause uncertainties in the Λ values of nearly one order of magnitude for particles smaller than 3 μm. The use of different formulations of raindrop number size distribution can cause the Λ values to vary by a factor of 3 to 5 for all particle sizes. The uncertainty in Λ, caused by the use of different droplet terminal velocity formulations, is generally smaller than a factor of 2. All of the current theoretical Λ parameterizations, however, underpredict the Λ values by one to two orders of magnitude for particles smaller than 3 μm, compared with most available field measurements or with empirical formulas generated from field observations. The combined uncertainties from known sources are, thus, not enough to explain the large discrepancies between the theoretical and experimental studies, suggesting a need for further investigations of the collection mechanisms through field, laboratory and numerical studies. The differences in the predicted particle concentrations, due to the use of different Λ parameterizations, can be larger than a factor of 10 for ultrafine and coarse particles even after a small amount of rain (e.g., 2–5 mm). The differences for submicron-sized particles can also be larger than a factor of 2 if sufficient rainfall occurs. Lastly, predicted bulk concentrations (integrated over the particle size distribution) from using different theoretical and empirical Λ parameterizations can differ by up to 50% for particle number and by up to 25% for particle mass after just 2–5 mm of rain.

Citation: Wang, X., Zhang, L., and Moran, M. D.: Uncertainty assessment of current size-resolved parameterizations for below-cloud particle scavenging by rain, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., 10, 2503-2548, doi:10.5194/acpd-10-2503-2010, 2010.
 
Search ACPD
Discussion Paper
    XML
    Citation
    Final Revised Paper
    Share