Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., 10, 19901-19938, 2010
© Author(s) 2010. This work is distributed
under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Review Status
This discussion paper has been under review for the journal Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP). Please refer to the corresponding final paper in ACP.
Boundary layer dynamics over London, UK, as observed using Doppler lidar
J. F. Barlow1, T. M. Dunbar1, E. G. Nemitz2, C. R. Wood1, M. W. Gallagher3, F. Davies4,6, E. O'Connor1,7, and R. M. Harrison5
1Department of Meteorology, University of Reading, P.O. Box 243, Reading, RG6 6BB, UK
2Centre for Ecology and Hydrology (Edinburgh), Bush Estate, Penicuik, EH26 0QB, UK
3School of Earth, Atmospheric and Environmental Sciences, University of Manchester, Williamson Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
4University of Salford, Room 315 Peel Building, The Crescent, Greater Manchester, M5 4WT, UK
5School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
6now at: School of Earth and Environment, Maths/Earth and Environment Building, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK
7now at: Finnish Meteorological Institute, P.O. Box 503, 00101 Helsinki, Finland

Abstract. Urban boundary layers (UBLs) can be highly complex due to the heterogeneous roughness and heating of the surface, particularly at night. Due to a general lack of observations, it is not clear whether canonical models of boundary layer mixing are appropriate in modelling air quality in urban areas. This paper reports Doppler lidar observations of turbulence profiles in the centre of London, UK, as part of the second REPARTEE campaign in autumn 2007. Lidar-measured standard deviation of vertical velocity averaged over 30 min intervals generally compared well with in situ sonic anemometer measurements at 190 m on the BT telecommunications tower. During calm, nocturnal periods, the lidar underestimated turbulent mixing due mainly to limited sampling rate. Mixing height derived from the turbulence, and aerosol layer height from the backscatter profiles, showed similar diurnal cycles ranging from ca. 300 to 800 m, increasing to ca. 200 to 850 m under clear skies. The aerosol layer height was sometimes significantly different to the mixing height, particularly at night under clear skies. For convective and neutral cases, the scaled turbulence profiles resembled canonical results; this was less clear for the stable case. Lidar observations clearly showed enhanced mixing beneath stratocumulus clouds reaching down on occasion to approximately half daytime boundary layer depth. On one occasion the nocturnal turbulent structure was consistent with a nocturnal jet, suggesting a stable layer. Given the general agreement between observations and canonical turbulence profiles, mixing timescales were calculated for passive scalars released at street level to reach the BT Tower using existing models of turbulent mixing. It was estimated to take ca. 10 min to diffuse up to 190 m, rising to between 20 and 50 min at night, depending on stability. Determination of mixing timescales is important when comparing to physico-chemical processes acting on pollutant species measured simultaneously at both the ground and at the BT Tower during the campaign. From the 3 week autumnal data-set there is evidence for occasional stable layers in central London, effectively decoupling surface emissions from air aloft.

Citation: Barlow, J. F., Dunbar, T. M., Nemitz, E. G., Wood, C. R., Gallagher, M. W., Davies, F., O'Connor, E., and Harrison, R. M.: Boundary layer dynamics over London, UK, as observed using Doppler lidar, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., 10, 19901-19938, doi:10.5194/acpd-10-19901-2010, 2010.
Search ACPD
Discussion Paper
    Final Revised Paper