Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., 10, 14513-14556, 2010
www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/10/14513/2010/
doi:10.5194/acpd-10-14513-2010
© Author(s) 2010. This work is distributed
under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Review Status
This discussion paper has been under review for the journal Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP). Please refer to the corresponding final paper in ACP.
Can 3-D models explain the observed fractions of fossil and non-fossil carbon in and near Mexico City?
A. Hodzic1, J. L. Jimenez2, A. S. H. Prévôt3, S. Szidat4, J. D. Fast5, and S. Madronich1
1NCAR Earth System Laboratory, Boulder, CO, USA
2Dept. of Chemistry and Biochemistry, and CIRES, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA
3Laboratory of Atmospheric Chemistry, Paul Scherrer Institut, Switzerland
4Dept. of Chemistry and Biochemistry, and Oeschger Centre for Climate Change Research, University of Bern, Switzerland
5Pacifc Nortwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA

Abstract. A 3-D chemistry-transport model has been applied to the Mexico City metropolitan area to investigate the origin of elevated levels of non-fossil (NF) carbonaceous aerosols observed in this highly urbanized region. High time resolution measurements of the fine aerosol concentration and composition, and 12 or 24 h integrated 14C measurements of aerosol modern carbon have been performed in and near Mexico City during the March 2006 MILAGRO field experiment. The non-fossil carbon fraction (fCNF), which is lower than the measured modern fraction (fCM) due to the elevated 14C in the atmosphere caused by nuclear bomb testing, is estimated from the measured fCM and the available source information. The fCNF contained in PM1 total carbon (fCNFTC) ranged from 0.37 to 0.67 at the downtown location (T0), and from 0.50 to 0.86 at the suburban site T1. Substantially lower values (i.e. 0.24–0.49) were found for PM10 filters at T0 by an independent set of measurements, which are inconsistent with the modeled and known differences between the size ranges, suggesting higher than expected uncertainties in the measurement techniques of 14C. An increase in the non-fossil organic carbon (OC) fraction (fCNFOC) by 0.10–0.15 was observed for both sets of filters during periods with enhanced wildfire activity in comparison to periods when fires were suppressed by rain, which is consistent with the wildfire impacts estimated with other methods. Model results show that the relatively high fraction of non-fossil carbon found in Mexico City seems to arise from the combination of regional biogenic SOA, biomass burning OA, as well as non-fossil urban OA. Similar spatial and temporal variations for fCNFOC are predicted between the urban vs. suburban sites, and high-fire vs. low-fire periods. The absolute modeled values of fCNFOC are consistent with the PM10 dataset but lower than the PM1 filters. Resolving the 14C measurement discrepancies is necessary for further progress in model evaluation. The model simulations that included secondary organic aerosol (SOA) formation from semi-volatile and intermediate volatility (S/IVOC) vapors showed better skill in explaining both total OA mass and fCNFOC compared to simulations which only included SOA from VOCs. Urban sources of modern carbon are important in reducing or closing the gap between model and measurements, even though they are often neglected on the interpretation of 14C datasets. The fCNF of urban POA and SOA precursors is an important parameter that needs to be better constrained by measurements. Performing faster (≤3 h) 14C measurements in future campaigns is critical to further progress in this area. To our knowledge this is the first time that radiocarbon measurements are used together with aerosol mass spectrometer (AMS) organic components to assess the performance of a regional model for organic aerosols.

Citation: Hodzic, A., Jimenez, J. L., Prévôt, A. S. H., Szidat, S., Fast, J. D., and Madronich, S.: Can 3-D models explain the observed fractions of fossil and non-fossil carbon in and near Mexico City?, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., 10, 14513-14556, doi:10.5194/acpd-10-14513-2010, 2010.
 
Search ACPD
Discussion Paper
XML
Citation
Final Revised Paper
Share