<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article SYSTEM "http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/inc/acpd/copernicus.dtd">
<article language="en">
	<journal>
		<journal_title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions</journal_title>
		<journal_url>www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net</journal_url>
		<issn>1680-7367</issn>
		<eissn>1680-7375</eissn>
		<volume_number>1</volume_number>
		<issue_number>1</issue_number>
		<publication_year>2001</publication_year>
	</journal>
	<doi>10.5194/acpd-1-221-2001</doi>
	<article_url>http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/1/221/2001/</article_url>
	<abstract_html>http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/1/221/2001/acpd-1-221-2001.html</abstract_html>
	<fulltext_pdf>http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/1/221/2001/acpd-1-221-2001.pdf</fulltext_pdf>
	<start_page>221</start_page>
	<end_page>238</end_page>
	<publication_date>2001-09-03</publication_date>
	<article_title content_type="html">Tropical cirrus and water vapor: an effective Earth infrared iris feedback?</article_title>
	<authors>
		<author numeration="1" affiliations="1">
			<name>Q. Fu</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="2" affiliations="1">
			<name>M. Baker</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="3" affiliations="1">
			<name>D. L. Hartmann</name>
		</author>
	</authors>
	<affiliations>
		<affiliation numeration="1" content_type="html">Department of Atmospheric Sciences, Box 351640, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA</affiliation>
	</affiliations>
	<abstract content_type="html">We revisit a model of feedback processes proposed by Lindzen et al. (2001), in which
an assumed 22% reduction in the area of tropical high clouds per degree of sea surface
temperature increase produces negative feedbacks associated with upper tropospheric
water vapor and cloud radiative effects. We argue that the water vapor feedback is 
overestimated in Lindzen et al. (2001) by at least 60%, and that the high cloud feedback
should be small. Although not mentioned by Lindzen et al, tropical low clouds make a
significant contribution to their negative feedback, which is also overestimated. Using
more realistic parameters in the model of Lindzen et al., we obtain a feedback factor
in the range of &amp;minus;0.15 to &amp;minus;0.51, compared to their larger negative feedback factor of
&amp;minus;0.45 to &amp;minus;1.03.</abstract>
	<references>
	</references>
</article>

